However, it stays accessible to how the audience relates to so it works, which is the substance out-of condition

Scientific analysis, try out steps, results and you will perceptions is actually designed in the brain, plus creativeness and you will keyword and style programming. Ideal reporting regarding results is even crucial. Especially in theoretical physics, linguistic ability and you will carefulness when you find yourself writing are becoming an even more clicking you would like for the the fresh new sufferers at perspectives out of current studies. You can find people from other sphere who’re willing to get me wrong and you may ignite way too many discourses/conclusions; they build courses away from a number of bytes of data such as for instance “yes/no/maybe”; consequently, nonscience otherwise occult misinformation emerges, types of and this are plentiful in the sphere away from unique relativity concept and you will quantum physics. For this reason, technology cannot make use of the phrases you to served the fresh Paleolithic attention. Category: Standard Science and you may Viewpoints

Trappist-step one Celebrity Program

The fresh new James Webb Area Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend precisely what the Hubble could have been capable talk about. One of its very first goals will likely be the fresh TRAPPIST-1 star system inside Aquarius. It essay examines as to why you to definitely puny red dwarf is really interesting, and exactly why the search for alien lives models age. Category: General Research and you may Beliefs

Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], Single Parent dating online [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy